ISSN: 2394-0638  
DOI: 10.21276/rjaes     
   
Publication Ethics


It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines 

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. 

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.

A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Special Issue
  News/Events
  Copyright
  Archive
 
  Indexing/Abstracting
  Authorship
  Join Editorial Board
  Citation reports
 
  Publishing Schedule
  Open Access
  Conflicts of Interest
  Author fees
 
  Privacy policy
  Blog
  Contact us
  Advertising
 
Copyright © 2014 www.rjaes.com All rights reserved